View Single Post
  #2  
Old May 20th, 2003, 01:31
Seth Racey Seth Racey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: 2003
Posts: 1
Pediatric Vaccines

The American Academy of Pediatrics published a review on its web site which is quite revealing about geiers work.
http://www.aap.org/profed/thimaut-may03.htm

However there is no author atributed to the review, this is not on in journalism or science. Although some of there points are valid, specifically there is not enough information on how the data was analysed. However the geiers study is alot more powerful than the Institute of medcine and Center for disease Control report on the same dataset. It is also alot more transparent as to the methods used and the origin of the data set. The official reports are not peer reviewed journals and contian very little information in to the scientific practicesn employed.

The Geires study is therefore the best that we have got. If you want to discount their views you have to account for how positive association as powerful as those given arose with out there being a biological significant effect of thiomerosal. In my view the only practice that could account for the association other than true mercury poisoning would have to be if the Geier directly falsified their data. I do not believe they did!

It is worth remember that if the geiers study is fully validated the vaccine mauifactures face litigation for billions and it is unlikely that they would surive. They are fighting for there survival and they must challenge this data by every menas necessary wehter it is scientifically justified or not.
Reply With Quote