Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > News
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 28th, 2003, 16:25
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
CT for Differentiation of Benign Versus Malignant Gastric Cancer: Accuracy = 65.8%

This study of 36 patients found that a gastric wall thickness of 1 cm or greater was 100% sensitive but only 42% specific for the determination of gastric cancer. Comment: the authors tried to find good CT criteria for differentiating benign from malignant gastric cancer, but were not successful. Depending on the criteria, either the sensitivity is high and the specificity is low, or the sensitivity is low and the specificity is high. In their population, the accuracy using the 1 cm wall thickness criteria, was 65.8%. There were 8 true positives, 13 false positives, 0 false negatives, and 17 true negatives. Accuracy rate was thus 25/38 = 65.8%

[ Radiology -- Abstracts: Insko et al. 228 (1): 166 ]

Last edited by sysadmin : July 28th, 2003 at 16:25.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
August 2002 sysadmin News 0 September 2nd, 2002 19:44
July 2002 sysadmin News 0 August 12th, 2002 19:08


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:00.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of Medjournal.com or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Medjournal.com. Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.