Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > News
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 7th, 2002, 18:08
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
May 19 - May 25, 2002





Saturday, May 25, 2002






Prevention is the best cure



As we've said all along here at the Internet Medical Journal, prevention is the best cure. Now, a study in the Lancet has come to the same conclusion regarding HIV infection in Africa- that prevention will save more lives than treating those who already have HIV. Comment: no kidding. It's really mind boggling that this study was published in such a prestigious journal. Their study basically said that preventing a lethal, incurable disease will save more lives than treating an incurable, lethal disease. [ article ]
 posted by the
Internet Medical Journal
 

05:32 GMT

 © medjournal.com









Oral Anti-Viral Medication Kills Smallpox



Cidofivir, when combined with lecithin, has been shown in animal studies to kill the smallpox virus. It can be taken orally in pill form. It has been tested on the cellular level and also in mice. [ article ]
 posted by the
Internet Medical Journal
 

03:56 GMT

 © medjournal.com









Genetic Engineering Makes Mosquitoes Unable to Transmit Malaria



A team of German and American researchers have genetically modified mosquitoes, making them unable to transmit malaria. Between 300 and 500 million people are infected with malaria each year, and one to three million people die each year from the disease. [ article ]
 posted by the
Internet Medical Journal
 

03:39 GMT

 © medjournal.com









Malpractice Lawsuits a Lottery?



A man was awarded a $250 000 USD award from a medical malpractice lawsuit. The case was due to problems the man received as a result of doctors leaving a surgical tool inside of his abdomen after surgery. Comment: this plaintiff in this case certainly deserved compensation. However, what is interesting is that the article headline states that he *won* $250 000. Are lawsuits simply lotteries that are won or lost? I would have liked to have seen that the man was awarded $250 000 *and* that the hospital surgical program was forced to make changes in their quality control procedures. [ article ]
 posted by the
Internet Medical Journal
 

03:12 GMT

 © medjournal.com









Friday, May 24, 2002






Medical News Goes Multimedia



You may now listen and view online the articles reviewed by Dr. Heston in a convenient multimedia presentation. [ Click Here to View ]
 posted by the
Internet Medical Journal
 

02:59 GMT

 © medjournal.com









Wednesday, May 22, 2002






18000 Die Prematurely Due to No Medical Insurance



A report from the US Institute of Medicine estimates that 18 000 uninsured American adults die prematurely due to their lack of proper medical care. [ article ]
 posted by the
Internet Medical Journal
 

22:59 GMT

 © medjournal.com









Mild Depression Associated With Longevity in Women



This study from Duke University looked at 2401 women and 1269 men 65 years of age and older. It found that women with mild depression were less likely to die over the three to four year followup period. The researchers speculate that mild depression may lead to adaptive behaviors.[ article ]
 posted by the
Internet Medical Journal
 

21:28 GMT

 © medjournal.com









Tuesday, May 21, 2002






Stress Inhibits Blood Vessel Relaxation



This study of 23 healthy individuals found that mental stress resulted in a 50% decrease in the ability of the blood vessel endothelium to increase blood flow. This decreased ability to expand could be the reason why stressful events have been associated with an increased risk of a heart attack. Comment: note the earlier pearl that found that exercise increases the ability of blood vessels to relax. Thus, at the level of the blood vessel, exercise is a good antidote to stress. [ article ]
 posted by the
Internet Medical Journal
 

03:43 GMT

 © medjournal.com









Monday, May 20, 2002






Great Britain to License Doctors



The UK plans to require doctors to submit evidence to their General Medical Council that they are getting the continuing medical education they need to stay up to date. Those doctors that are not maintaining proper continuing education will not be licensed. Comment: most US states- but not all- require that doctors get continuing medical education in order to be licensed to practice medicine. Although many older doctors who became board certified a long time ago no longer need to retake an exam to maintain their board certification status, almost all of the younger doctors do. For example, to maintain my status as a board-certified family physician, I need to retake and pass the board exam every 7 years. Furthermore, to maintain my status as a member in the American Academy of Family Physicians, I need to have at least 50 hours of continuing medical education a year. This is becoming standard practice for nearly all of the certification boards in the US. Individual states, however, vary considerably in the number of hours of continuing education required to be licensed. [ article ]
 posted by the
Internet Medical Journal
 

18:07 GMT

 © medjournal.com









Heat Treatment for Breast Cancer



A team from the Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center has developed a heat treatment system to treat breast cancer. The treatment was tested on 21 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. The trial lasted 12 weeks. The heat treatment was combined with chemotherapy. Most of the women in the trial had been told their cancer was inoperable. The outcome of the trial was positive, with many patients no longer having evidence of any cancer and others being able to undergo lumpectomy rather than radical mastectomy. Comment: these findings were presented at a meeting-- and not yet publication quality. The statistics given in the news article don't add up correctly. For example the article states that 11% of the women hand no cancer found when the breast tissue was analyzed. This is equal to 2.31 patients (11% of 21 = 2.31). They also state that 17% of the patients were now suitable for lumpectomies as opposed to radical mastectomies. Well, 17% of 21 = 3.57. I wonder how 3.57 patients underwent lumpectomies. This highlights the problem with putting too much credence on research presented at meetings. I've been told that approximately 50% of the research papers presented at a meeting never make it to publication in a peer reviewed journal. Nevertheless, I believe that this is really exciting research! The hypotheses and science behind this work is very solid, and it comes from an excellent medical center - Duke. [ article ]
 posted by the
Internet Medical Journal
 

17:58 GMT

 © medjournal.com



Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2002.12.01 Medical News sysadmin News 0 January 8th, 2003 17:31
2002.11.01 Medical News sysadmin News 0 January 8th, 2003 17:30
2002.10.01 General Medical Pearls sysadmin News 0 December 12th, 2002 08:55
2002.09.01 General Medical Pearls sysadmin News 0 December 12th, 2002 08:53
Confronting the New Health Care Crisis sysadmin News 0 August 14th, 2002 19:28


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:00.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of Medjournal.com or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Medjournal.com. Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.