Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > News
User Name
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old September 6th, 2004, 21:04
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
Reckless medical scans

For a prime example of medical screening that has proliferated beyond reason, consider the alarming case of full-body computed tomography scans to detect cancer, cardiovascular disease and other conditions. Narrowly targeted CT scans aimed at particular organs are undeniably valuable when used to pin down a diagnosis in sick patients. But full-body scans to screen healthy individuals for hidden disease have never been shown to be effective, and now there is evidence that the scans may be harmful. A new study finds that the scans impart radiation doses comparable to those received by atomic-bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing a small but significant increase in the risk of cancer.

Visit: 9/7/2004 International Herald Tribune
Reply With Quote
Old September 29th, 2004, 19:33
hudunnit hudunnit is offline
Registered User
Join Date: 2004
Posts: 3
Question Re: Reckless medical scans

That is more than scary - since the cardiologists are herding people into these tests like cattle to be branded

Should a woman who has had irradiation of the breast be forewarned of this danger???

We used to worry about the bomb - but by these "tests" we are being dosed anyway aarrggh.............
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bone Scans More Sensitive, PET Scans More Specific in Lung Cancer Metastases sysadmin News 0 August 30th, 2004 19:27
2002.09.01 General Medical Pearls sysadmin News 0 December 12th, 2002 08:53
Confronting the New Health Care Crisis sysadmin News 0 August 14th, 2002 20:28
May 5 - May 11, 2002 sysadmin News 0 May 20th, 2002 17:06
April 28 - May 04, 2002 sysadmin News 0 May 20th, 2002 16:49

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 22:35.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.