Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > News
User Name
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old July 4th, 2005, 15:37
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
PET FDG for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer

Positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer. Takekuma M, Maeda M, Ozawa T, Yasumi K, Torizuka T. Department of Gynecology, Hamamatsu Medical Center, 328 Tomitsukacho, Hamamatsu, 432-8580, Japan, Int J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun;10(3):177-81

OBJECTIVE: evaluate the usefulness of PET FDG in recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: 29 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer were evaluated. Patients in whom there was a suspician of recurrence were studied (CA-125 increased, or abnormal CT or MRI despite normal CA-125). The rates of accurate diagnosis of recurrence achieved using CT/MRI, CA125, and FDG-PET in patients with a definitive diagnosis of relapse were compared. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of FDG-PET were 84.6% (22/26), 100% (3/3), 100% (22/22), 42.9% (3/7), and 86.2% (25/29), respectively. These values were higher than the corresponding values obtained using CT/MRI or CA125 levels. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET is both more sensitive and accurate than CA-125, CT, or MRI in the detection of ovarian cancer recurrence. PMID: 15990965
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2005 sysadmin News 0 February 11th, 2005 21:50
FDG PET Effective in Determining the Response to Therapy in Gastroesophageal Cancer sysadmin News 0 August 30th, 2004 18:23
Meta-analysis Concludes FDG PET is Superior to Conventional Imaging in Lung Cancer sysadmin News 0 July 5th, 2003 08:44
Detection of Unexpected Extrathoracic Metastases in Lung Cancer by PET sysadmin News 0 July 4th, 2003 10:37
August 2002 sysadmin News 0 September 2nd, 2002 19:44

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 15:13.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.