Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > News
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 5th, 2005, 19:59
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
Physician Supply Increases in States with Caps on Malpractice Lawsuit Awards

Study Finds Physician Supply Increases in States with Caps on Malpractice Lawsuit Awards, with the Greatest Impact in Rural Areas
Press Release Date: May 31, 2005

States that have capped malpractice lawsuit awards have seen a larger growth in the number of practicing physicians than those States without such caps, according to a new study from HHS' Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).

Between 1970 and 2000, the number of physicians per 100,000 residents more than doubled in the 13 States that enacted caps on non-economic damages during the 1980s, compared to an 83 percent physician growth rate in the 23 States that didn't cap malpractice awards before 2000, according to the authors, AHRQ's William E. Encinosa, Ph.D., and Fred J. Hellinger, Ph.D. The study is being published today on the Health Affairs Web site at http://content.healthaffairs.org/cg.../hlthaff.w5.250.

"Malpractice litigation reforms can ensure better access to quality care for all Americans," HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said. "Our Nation's health care system should no longer be held hostage to frivolous medical lawsuits, which only drive up health care costs, lead to defensive medicine, and make it harder for America's doctors to provide safe and accessible care."

Drs. Encinosa and Hellinger found that the dollar amount of the cap also had an impact on the supply of physicians, especially in rural areas. Between 1975 and 2000, the growth in the median number of rural physicians per 100,000 residents in States with caps of $250,000 was 9 percent higher than in States with caps above $250,000. Currently, 27 States have caps on malpractice awards; of those, five States have caps with a $250,000 limit.

Surgeons and obstetrician/gynecologists—who are most likely to be sued and who often pay the highest malpractice premiums—were the specialists most likely to be affected by caps of $250,000. The median number of surgical specialists per 100,000 increased by 41 percent for States with caps of $250,000, but only by 31 percent for States with caps above $250,000. For obstetrician/gynecologists per 100,000 women ages 15 to 44, the increases are 61 percent in States with caps of $250,000 and 49 percent for States with higher caps.

"This study contributes to the growing foundation of evidence underpinning efforts to reform malpractice laws in this country," said Carolyn M. Clancy, M.D., director of AHRQ. "This research will help inform States as they work to balance the concerns of physicians and the need to ensure access to services for their citizens."

Drs. Encinosa and Hellinger used county-specific data from the Area Resources Files maintained by HHS' Health Resources and Services Administration. They compared physician supply in 49 States, excluding Alaska and the District of Columbia, from 1985 to 2000 to study the impact of the malpractice caps. Caps generally increased physician supply by 2 to 3 percent three years after adoption, after accounting for other factors that impact physician supply. These other factors included fixed differences across counties, such as socioeconomic, political, cultural, and regulatory factors, as well as factors that could impact the demand for physicians, including HMO and Medicare enrollment, whether the county has a medical school, disease rates, and the county's birth rate. In addition, the authors also accounted for the effects of four other State malpractice reforms, including collateral source rule reform, prejudgment interest reform, joint and several liability reform, and caps on punitive damages.

http://www.ahcpr.gov/news/press/pr2005/malcappr.htm
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rand Study Shows Effects of California Malpractice Law sysadmin News 0 July 12th, 2004 20:39
Confronting the New Health Care Crisis sysadmin News 0 August 14th, 2002 19:28


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 20:16.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of Medjournal.com or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Medjournal.com. Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.