Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > News
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 7th, 2005, 22:28
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
Detection of jeopardized myocardium with Tl-201

Reinjection of a second dose of Tl-201 before redistribution imaging has significantly improved the ability of myocardial perfusion imaging to detect jeopardized myocardium. However, PET studies and the results from coronary artery angioplasty and bypass surgery indicate that Tl-201 studies still underestimate the number of ischemic areas at stress that represent viable myocardium. To determine whether an imaging protocol using an early reinjection of Tl-201 immediately after acquisition of the stress images would improve the detection of jeopardized myocardium, 138 patients were studied with an early reinjection protocol and the incidence and magnitude of reversible defects were compared by SPECT to a second group of 143 patients who underwent the standard late reinjection protocol. Two observers independently evaluated 19 standard myocardial segments by visual examination in each patient. They determined the presence or absence of reversible defects, and, when present, their magnitude. The frequency of reversible defects always was less with early reinjection compared to the standard late reinjection; the difference reached statistical significance for one of the two observers (P < 0.05). It is concluded that early reinjection of Tl-201 in myocardial perfusion imaging does not increase and may decrease the sensitivity of the study for jeopardized myocardium.

PMID: 8319401

Clin Nucl Med. 1993 Jun;18(6):487-90. Related Articles, Links

Detection of jeopardized myocardium with Tl-201 myocardial perfusion imaging. Comparison of early and late reinjection protocols.

Klingensmith WC 3rd, Sutherland JD.

Department of Radiology, Porter Memorial Hospital, Denver, Colorado.


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...9401&query_hl=7
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thallium-201 for Detection of Myocardial Viability sysadmin News 0 June 7th, 2005 22:14
American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2005 sysadmin News 0 February 11th, 2005 22:50
PET is superior to CT for metastatic detection in melanoma sysadmin News 0 September 11th, 2003 12:27
Meta-analysis: Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculos in Crohn's Disease sysadmin Articles 0 September 24th, 2001 15:48


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:43.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of Medjournal.com or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Medjournal.com. Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.