Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > News
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 26th, 2004, 18:58
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
Mammography Has Low Risk of Recall For False Positive Findings

Atlanta 2004/08/23 -A new long-term study finds over 20 years, only one in five women who have mammograms every two years will have to undergo follow up evaluation for a false positive finding. Only one in 16 will have an unnecessary invasive procedure over two decades. The study, published August 23, 2004 in the online edition of CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society, should reassure physicians and patients that the risks of breast cancer screening are minimal given the notable benefit of breast cancer screening. A free abstract of the study will be available via Wiley InterScience upon embargo.
Breast cancer screening by regular screening mammography has a proven benefit to saving lives. However, false positives and subsequent recall for follow up evaluation create significant psychosocial distress.

The extent of false positive recall is unclear. Previous studies have claimed the cumulative risk of a high false positive recall over the years was significant. However, the estimates and conclusions made to date are weakened by flawed study designs.

Solveig Hofvind, M.Sc., and her colleagues from the Cancer Registry of Norway reviewed data of 83,416 women from the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening program, a uniform national program providing biennial screening mammography for women who are 50 to 69 years of age.

The authors found that women who begin biennial screening mammography at age 50 or 51 and participate in screening for 20 years had a cumulative 20-year risk for false positive recall of 20.8 percent. The risk for undergoing invasive procedures with benign findings was considerably lower at 6.2 percent. Most of those were for fine needle aspiration (3.9 percent). Only about one in 66 women had a core biopsy with benign findings (1.5 percent). Fewer than one in a hundred women had open biopsy with benign findings (0.9 percent).

Given this low 20-year risk level, conclude the authors, "all the estimates seem to be quite acceptable and ought to be communicated to the target group."



Article: “The Cumulative Risk of a False-Positive Recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program,” Solveig Hofvind, Steinar Thoresen, Steinar Tretli, CANCER; Published Online: August 23, 2004 (DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20528); Print Issue Date: October 1, 2004.



Eric Miller
Manager, Media Relations
American Cancer Society
(404) 417-5839
eric.miller@cancer.org


Taka Wiley
Administrative Specialist
American Cancer Society
(404) 417-5860
taka.wiley@cancer.org
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Levels a Risk Factor For Alzheimer's Disease sysadmin News 0 June 11th, 2004 07:19
Low Plasma Selenium Levels Associated With an Increased Risk of Prostate Cancer sysadmin News 0 June 5th, 2004 19:11
2002.10.01 General Medical Pearls sysadmin News 0 December 12th, 2002 08:55
July 2002 sysadmin News 0 August 12th, 2002 19:08


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:09.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of Medjournal.com or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Medjournal.com. Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.