Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > Editorials
User Name
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old September 24th, 2001, 14:21
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
1997.07.12 Is Giving Free Samples to the Poor a Good Idea?

The sampling of medicines is a common practice in primary care settings throughout the United States. Most clinics will be well stocked with free medicines supplied by pharmaceutical companies. This allows the doctor to give free samples out to those patients who cannot pay for a prescription. Sounds good, right? Wrong.

Samples are supplied by the pharmaceutical companies because they want to promote a new product. This becomes problematic for many reasons. First, the antibiotics supplied are all new, second and third line agents. By resorting to these newer agents (e.g. cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones) before the recommended first line agents (e.g. amoxicillin, erythromycin, or doxycycline), the development of antibiotic resistance is encouraged. This is of particular concern because this antibiotic resistance, due to the sampling of medications, is to the most powerful and newest antibiotics. Everyone should be concerned about this- even those with insurance and/or enough money to pay for prescription antibiotics. When bacteria resistance to antibiotics develops in a community, all of us are at risk. The bacteria don't care about social class, race, or sex. Everyone pays the price.

How about giving out samples to patients with high blood pressure? Again, the samples supplied by the pharmaceutical companies are the newer and more expensive medicines. Starting a patient out on these medicines frequently is disasterous to poor patients, because they get on a regimen that can cost up to 10 times as much as a generic medicine that works just as well. When the samples are gone, the monthly bill can break a family's budget. Thus, the poor patient will often stop the life-saving medicine. This tragedy may have been avoided if the patient was initially started on the inexpensive, generic medicine.

Relevant to this discussion is an editorial by Dr. Merle A. Sande, Professor and Chairman of Internal Medicine at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City (Family Practice News, 15-June-1999, p.12). Here's how he puts it: "We have totally blown it- absolutely, completely screwed up. It's shattering to think how we've misused and abused what were once called wonder drugs." He goes on to describe how the misuse of antibiotics has resulted in serious antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, future generations will suffer as a result.

Is giving free samples to the poor a good idea? No. By doing so we are creating pockets of serious antibiotic resistance, that will eventually spread throughout the world. There must be a better way!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 20:07.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.