Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > News
User Name
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old October 1st, 2001, 11:28
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
Smallpox threat small but worrisome

Reprinted from

Smallpox Threat Small but Worrisome Wires
Friday, Sept. 28, 2001

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. population is vulnerable to a terrorist attack using smallpox as a weapon, but the risk of it actually happening is reduced because of the difficulty in obtaining a sample of the virus.

The vulnerability stems from the eradication of the virus itself - the last case was found in Somalia in 1977 - with routine vaccinations ending in the United States 1972. Both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated are at risk, experts told United Press International, because the vaccination required periodic updates that did not occur.

The country also is at risk, these experts said, because of America's failure to upgrade and maintain its public health system and provide appropriate surveillance to quickly catch and contain any outbreak.

"The vulnerability absolutely is very high," said Michael Powers, a research associate with the Chemical and Biological Arms Control Institute in Washington.

"The United States is very susceptible to an outbreak of smallpox." Dr. Nils Daulaire, president and chief executive officer of the Global Health Council in Washington agreed although he said the actual risk is moderate.

"It would be low if we had big stockpiles of vaccine on hand," he said, adding that following the World Health Organization's declaration in 1980 that the deadly virus had been eradicated. "There was a sense of security. We did not need to maintain the relatively high cost to maintain a vaccine for a disease that no longer existed."

There are about 10 million doses of the vaccine in storage, but even if the United States had a huge stockpile from the 1970s, questions remain about its efficacy and whether its use would be acceptable today because of the side effects.

Daulaire said the vaccine causes a severe and sometimes fatal adverse reaction in people infected with humane immunodeficiency virus, which causes AIDS. That would mean it could not be used for all populations.

America's vulnerability, however, is counterbalanced by the difficulty in obtaining a sample of the virus. Jonathan Tucker, whose new book, "Scourge: The Once and Future Threat of Smallpox" comes out this month, said during a talk on his book that in 1976 the WHO urged the 75 laboratories around the world with stocks of the virus to destroy or transfer them to secure repositories at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta or to a site in what was then the Soviet Union.

In 1983, South Africa became the last country to destroy its stock of virus, said Tucker, who also is director of the Chemical and Biological Weapons Nonproliferation Program at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies in Washington.

"It was possible that countries did not declare (their stock) for various reasons, possibly for nefarious reasons," Tucker said, adding it now is believed from three to eight countries - Iraq and North Korea often are mentioned - actually may have samples of the virus. In 1994, Russia moved its secured virus stock to a laboratory in Siberia known as Vector and Tucker said many experts who believe work was done there to develop a smallpox weapon.

Tucker said scientists believe a "viral slurry" was created at Vector and that perhaps 20 tons of a smallpox weapon, suitable for use on warheads, was maintained. He said while there is no "smoking gun" to indicate any undeclared stocks of virus, "the evidence is sufficiently compelling to make government officials concerned."

Knowing samples exist is one thing, but getting one and making it work as a weapon is another. "There are very significant technological hurdles that would have to be overcome," Tucker said, including ensuring the sample still is viable, finding a way to disseminate it -- such as in aerosol form or by having suicide terrorists infect themselves and walk through large crowds.

He noted, however, the methodical, long-term approach terrorists apparently took in the planning and execution of the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

"This is ominous if they apply the save methodological approach to biologics" especially if they have any help from other countries or organizations, he said.

Powers said the chance of terrorists acquiring a virus sample are low because "even those countries that support terrorist organizations have been less than willing" to provide them with the best technology and weapons. He added even if Osama bin Laden, considered by the Bush administration to be a "prime suspect" in Sept. 11 terror attacks in New York and Washington, is involved and if Iraq has a smallpox sample, there is "no great love" between bin Laden and Iraq's Saddam Hussein.

"I don't think the public should be worried about it [smallpox], but I think we have been a bit behind the curve in our planning and action in this," Daulaire said. He said the United States needs a surveillance system geared toward picking up relatively common but serious diseases so that smallpox surveillance can be easily be added to it.

Powers said the U.S. health care system is not geared toward early detection of smallpox, which has a 10- to 12-day incubation period before symptoms occur.

He said more government support is needed at the state and local levels to create an infrastructure that can detect, contain and eradicate any smallpox outbreak.

Tucker said should smallpox be released into the general population, each person infected could infect 50 others - or more - before a diagnosis is made, creating waves of smallpox occurring in about two-week cycles, each wave larger than the previous.

Prior to its eradication, smallpox killed hundreds of millions of people over the ages, throughout the world. Still today, there is no effective treatment, only containment of an outbreak and vaccination.

Copyright 2001 by United Press International. All rights reserved.

reproduced with the permission of All rights reserved.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camel Virus Potential Terrorist Threat sysadmin Articles 0 May 4th, 2002 17:47
Smallpox terrorist risk sysadmin News 0 October 10th, 2001 10:40

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:25.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.