Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > News
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 29th, 2002, 17:06
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
July 14 - July 20, 2002


Saturday, July 20, 2002

Mad Cow Disease Risk in France
French authorities have found that over 10% of cattle carcasses about to go to market still contained spinal cord material. Spinal cord parts from cattle have been banned because of the risk of transmitting variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease to humans. [ article ]  


California Supreme Court Allows Medical Marijuana
In another battle between the states with medical marijuana laws, and the federal government that wants to prosecute both doctors and patients, California's Supreme Court has re-affirmed that their state's medical marijuana laws should be obeyed by California courts. Comment: it's truly amazing that the federal government wants to go after medical marijuana users and prosecute them. Don't they have anything better to do, or do they simply go after these patients because they are easy targets? [ article ]  


Friday, July 19, 2002

Cannabis Being Studied in Multiple Sclerosis
This is a review of the historical use of cannabinoids in treating medical disorders. Comment: unfortunately, to view the full article, Lancet requires a paid subscription. Cannibis almost certainly will be studied more scientifically as restrictions on its use in the United Kingdom are easing up. [ article ]  


Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women
Here is the link to the report in JAMA on the Women's Health Initiative trial that found an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio for estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women. Comment: Routine hormone replacement therapy with this combination is no longer recommended. article ]  


Tuesday, July 16, 2002

Donepezil Improves Mental Functioning in Nondemented Adults
The Alzheimer's medication donepezil at a dose of 5 mg a day was found to increase the performance of 18 licensed pilots with a mean age of 52 years old. Those on the donepezil showed a greater capacity to perform a set of complex simulator tasks as compared with those taking placebo (p value < 0.05). Comment: the pilots studied were all licensed, and we can assume actively piloted aircraft regularly. None apparently had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. [ article ]  


British Medical Association Votes Against Physician Assisted Suicide
By a vote of 96 to 82, the British Medical Association reaffirmed its policy against physician assisted suicide. [ article ]  


Monday, July 15, 2002

Substance Abuse Increases Suicide Risk in Teens
A recent survey from the US Government found that youths who reported past year alcohol or illicit drug use were more likely than youths who did not use these substances to be at risk for suicide. [ article ]  


Privacy of Your Medical Records Under Attack
NewsMax.Com Wires - Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com Monday, July 8, 2002 - Thanks to new federal regulations designed by ex-President Clinton and backed by President Bush, all kinds of people can now access your most private medical records without your say-so, just as NewsMax.com repeatedly warned. A lawsuit has revealed that a pharmacy company got its hands on the medical records of a woman and sent her junk mail containing samples of one of its drug products, Prozac Weekly, as a remedy for her medical problem; depression.

The lawsuit made Page One of the New York Times this weekend. Why the surprise? This is exactly the sort of privacy invasion NewsMax.com warned about just before the new so-called medical privacy regulations went into effect earlier this year.

In a March 13, 2001, heads-up, NewsMax.com reported that the regulation allegedly intended to improve the confidentiality of medical records contains a sleeper provision that gives health care providers the right to sell a person's confidential medical information to marketing firms and drug companies.

Under the proposal, NewsMax warned, doctors can even share the information with a "business partner," who can conduct marketing on behalf of a provider.

"It's perfectly legal under the rule for someone to knock on your door and say, 'I've learned from your doctor you have hemorrhoids; would you like to buy this treatment?' " said Bob Gellman, a medical privacy consultant and former congressional staffer.

"You can only opt out after you have been marketed to. I've been working on this issue for 20 years, and it's the worst anti-privacy thing I've seen."

President Bush told Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson to allow the new rules to go into effect in April last year despite a storm of protests including the tens of thousands of readers who
signed a NewsMax.com petition opposing the Clinton regulations. In the new lawsuit the unidentified plaintiff alleged she got the Prozac, which is used to treat anxiety and depression, in a hand-addressed manila envelope from a Walgreen's drugstore that contained a "Dear Patient" form letter which said "Enclosed you will find a free one-month trial of Prozac Weekly. Congratulations on being one step [closer] to full recovery."

The form letter appeared to have been written by a Lilly sales representative and was signed by the plaintiff's doctor and two other local doctors.

"We are very excited to be able to offer you a more convenient way to take your antidepressant medication," the letter said. "If you wish to try Prozac Weekly, stop your antidepressant one day before starting Prozac Weekly, then take Prozac Weekly once a week thereafter." According to the New York Times' Adam Liptak, that mailing angered the plaintiff, "a 59-year-old home caregiver who filed a class-action lawsuit this week in a state court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida."

"They're going after me because I have a problem," the woman, told the Times.

She agreed to an interview in her lawyer's office, providing her name would not be revealed. "It bothers me to think that somebody could get into my medical records and start sending me dangerous medications."

The lawsuit says the plaintiff, identified only as S.K., has had a diagnosis of depression, "which she maintains in the strictest of confidence due to potential public embarrassment and employment repercussions." It states that she did not have a prescription for Prozac.

"I hadn't been using Prozac for seven years or better," she told the Times. "It was a matter of a few months. It didn't agree with me."

Misuse of Records Charged

The lawsuit names Walgreen's, a local hospital, three doctors and Eli Lilly, which makes Prozac, charging they misused patients' medical records and invaded their privacy.
It also accused Walgreen's and the drug company "of engaging in the unauthorized practice of medicine," the Times reported

The plaintiffs' lawyers told the Times they didn't know how many people in addition to their client received the junk mailings. "It could be anywhere from several dozen to several thousand," Gary M. Farmer Jr., one of the lawyers, told the Times.

Dr. Lise Lambert, one of the doctors who signed the "Dear Patient" letter and the plaintiff's physician, is a defendant in the suit. She did not return the Times' calls and her medical group referred the Times' questions to Holy Cross Hospital, which is also named as a defendant.

A hospital spokeswoman said the hospital did not comment on matters in litigation. In early June the hospital issued a statement to the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel that said, "This particular effort was the result of well-intentioned, respected physicians being given an opportunity to arrange for some of their patients to receive sample medications, at no cost, through proper, licensed pharmacy channels."

The plaintiff told the Times that Dr. Lambert admitted signing blank letterhead, which the Lilly representative added text to and delivered to the drugstore for mailing. Whether or not Dr. Lambert reviewed the letter before signing, the mailing was improper, Dr. David L. Pearle, a professor of medicine at Georgetown University, told the Times.

"It's highly unethical," he said, "because it's clear that the letter is not an outgrowth of the doctor's relationship with the patient."

According to what legal experts told the Times, sending drugs through the mail could be criminal if the recipient does not have a prescription.

Debbie Davis, a Lilly spokeswoman, told the Times that sending unsolicited drugs through the mail was against company policy and inappropriate.

'Appears to Go Beyond'

"While Lilly supports informing people about new treatment options and encouraging
them to discuss these options with their doctor, what occurred in Florida appears to go beyond this," she said.

"It is inappropriate for Lilly sales personnel to support programs in which medicine is mailed to patients without the patient's request," she said in a statement.

"We understand why people should be concerned about receiving unsolicited prescriptions in the mail. To the extent Lilly personnel may have participated in this program, Lilly apologizes to those patients affected by it."

Medical privacy advocates have been critical of mailings of targeted marketing materials based on information in patients' pharmaceutical and medical records. They say the mailing of drugs is an unwelcome innovation.

"This is appalling in every possible way," Dr. Pearle told the Times. "It's an escalation of a deplorable practice."

Joy Pritts, senior counsel at the Health Privacy Project in Washington, added that "this is one step beyond what we normally see." She told the Times the Prozac mailing was part of "the increasing trend for the commercialization of health care information."

"It's being bought, sold and used like any other commodity," she said, referring to patients' medical information. "This has nothing to do with treating the patient. This has everything to do with generating profits."

And even more to do with the Bush administration's new rules that allow this sort of thing to happen without the patient giving permission to his or her doctor to release private medical data to every Tom, Dick and Harry.

Reprinted with permision from NewsMax.Com Wires. [ article ]  


Seatbelt Laws Save Lives- Especially Teenagers
Seatbelt laws have been shown to consistently save lives in car accidents. There is further evidence that "primary enforcement" laws have a significant impact upon increasing seatbelt usage. [ article ]  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2002.11.01 Medical News sysadmin News 0 January 8th, 2003 17:30
Confronting the New Health Care Crisis sysadmin News 0 August 14th, 2002 20:28
July 2002 sysadmin News 0 August 12th, 2002 20:10
July 2002 sysadmin News 0 August 12th, 2002 20:08
July 7 - July 13, 2002 sysadmin News 0 July 29th, 2002 17:04


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:01.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of Medjournal.com or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Medjournal.com. Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.