Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > News
User Name
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old February 16th, 2003, 12:39
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
2002.12.01 Cardiovascular Disease News

Saturday, December 21, 2002

NEJM: C-Reactive Protein and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels Both Help in the Prediction of First Cardiovascular Events

NEJM -- Abstracts: Ridker et al. 347 (20): 1557 ]  

AMNews: Dec. 23/30, 2002. Coordinated care improves outcomes for MI patients ... American Medical News

AMNews: Dec. 23/30, 2002. Coordinated care improves outcomes for MI patients ... American Medical News ]  
Wednesday, December 11, 2002

Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation to Sinus Does Not Improve Survival Compared to Rate Control Only

This study of 4060 patients with atrial fibrillation who had a high risk of stroke or death. One group was assigned to rhythm-control therapy, the other to rate-control therapy. The researchers conclude that the rhythm-control therapy has no survival advantage over the rate-control strategy. In fact, side-effects from medications used in the rhythm-control group may make a rate-control strategy better in terms of health benefits. Comment: a rate-control strategy also may be significantly less expensive, as well as associated with fewer side-effects and an equal mortality rate. [ NEJM 2002, Volume 347:1825-1833 ]  
Tuesday, December 10, 2002

Drug Eluting Stents

This editorial covers the status of drug eluting stents, the cost savings, and future. The author notes that the current rate of reintervention after angioplasty is 6% in the UK. [ Jenkins et al. 325 (7376): 1315 ]  
Tuesday, December 03, 2002

Coffee Consumption Shown to Increase Homocysteine Levels

This randomized study of 48 volunteers found that coffee (0.45 L, ~ 1.5 cups) raised homocysteine levels by 0.9 umol/L (an 11% increase) at 4 hours after consumption. The researchers looked specifically at whether or not caffeine was the responsible ingredient, and found that caffeine was only partly responsible for the elevation in homocysteine levels, raising the plasma concentration by 0.4 umol/L (a 5% increase) whereas coffee raised homocysteine by 0.9 umol/L. Comment: this is an interesting finding, and it is worthwhile looking into the effects of caffeinated soft drinks on homocysteine levels as well. [ AJCN -- Abstracts: Verhoef et al. 76 (6): 1244 ]  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease by more than 80% sysadmin News 0 July 3rd, 2003 13:54
2002.12.01 Nuclear Medicine News sysadmin News 0 February 16th, 2003 12:47
2002.12.01 Medical News sysadmin News 0 January 8th, 2003 17:31
2002.11.01 Medical News sysadmin News 0 January 8th, 2003 17:30
Meta-analysis: Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculos in Crohn's Disease sysadmin Articles 0 September 24th, 2001 15:48

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:20.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.