Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > News
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 17th, 2003, 16:33
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
Combined assessment of left ventricular perfusion and EF in risk stratification of patients with known or suspected coronary artery diseases undergoing vasodilator stress Tc-99m sestamibi gated SPECT.

This abstract looked at 1305 consecutive patients undergoing vasodilator nuclear cardiac SPECT imaging. Those with normal perfusion and LVEF >=45% had an annualized cardiac event rate of 0.7%; those with abnormal perfusion / normal LVEF had an event rate of 1.6%; those with normal perfusion / abnormal LVEF had an event rate of 3.1%; and those with abnormal perfusion and abnormal LVEF had an event rate of 5.9%. Comment: only normal perfusion with normal LVEF gives an annualized risk of < 1%. In this study, a normal LVEF was associated with the lowest risk categories. Normal perfusion was defined as no defects at all, either at stress or rest. [ Journal of Nuclear Cardiology January/February 2003, Part 2 Volume 10 Number 1 ]

Last edited by sysadmin : March 17th, 2003 at 16:33.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of Medjournal.com or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Medjournal.com. Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.