Community Forum top_calendar.gif top_members.gif top_faq.gif top_search.gif top_home.gif    

Go Back   Community Forum > The Internet Medical Journal > News
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 10th, 2004, 19:47
sysadmin sysadmin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: 2001
Posts: 1,085
AHA Tells FDA that Prescription Requirement Has No Effect on Safety of AEDs

WASHINGTON, July 30 /U.S. Newswire Press Release/ -- The American Heart Association told a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) panel yesterday that it supports the removal of the prescription requirement for automated external defibrillators (AEDs).

The FDA's Circulatory System Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee met today to decide whether or not to lift the prescription requirement currently required for anyone wishing to obtain an AED. AEDs are portable medical devices that provide the most effective treatment for sudden cardiac arrest victims who have a deadly abnormal heart rhythm known as ventricular fibrillation.

"Out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest is common, lethal, debilitating and costly," said Graham Nichol, M.D., chair of the American Heart Association's AED Task Force. "Many of these events occur in the home. CPR, defibrillation and advanced cardiac life support provided by emergency medical services (EMS) providers are effective if prompt. However, it is difficult for EMS systems to arrive on scene within the first few minutes following most cardiac arrests."

Sudden cardiac arrest is responsible for approximately 340,000 adult deaths in the U.S. that occur outside the hospital or in the emergency department. Approximately 95 percent of those who suffer sudden cardiac arrest outside a hospital die. For many people, sudden cardiac arrest is the first sign of cardiovascular disease.

Nichol conducted a review of the scientific literature from 1966 to the present to identify any adverse effects associated with the use of defibrillators. He uncovered no reports describing inappropriate shocks administered with AEDs -- only a small number of inappropriate shocks were made with manual defibrillators.

"We are unaware of any published or unpublished evidence that requiring a prescription prior to dispensing an AED increases the likelihood that a responder will be able to use the device, or that a prescription requirement decreases inappropriate use or adverse effects," said Nichol. "Therefore, the American Heart Association supports removal of the prescription requirement for AEDs."

Nichol emphasized the need for lay responders in both public and home settings to receive proper training in CPR and the use of AEDs.

The American Heart Association currently lacks sufficient scientific data to recommend for or against the use of AEDs in the home. A large, multi-year national study -- the HAT trial -- sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Philips Medical Systems, Inc., is currently underway to measure whether early defibrillation provided by family members using AEDs at home will increase survival. Results of the trial are expected in several years.

--

Dr. Nichol's comments to the panel are available upon request.


To: National Desk, Health Reporter

Contact: Tagni McRae, 214-706-1383, or Kelly Kennai of the American Heart Association, 202-785-7900
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:45.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



Be careful about reading health books. You may die of a misprint.  
- Mark Twain (1835 - 1910)

We are committed to your good health. That means that while we provide editorial medical information, we must insist that you work with your own doctor in regards to your personal health issues. All content on Medjournal.Com is strictly editorial. It constitutes medical opinion, NOT ADVICE. We do not endorse or recommend the content of Medjournal.com or the sites that are linked FROM or TO Medjournal.com. Use common sense by consulting with your doctor before making any lifestyle changes or other medical decisions based on the content of these web pages. Medjournal.Com and the Internet Medical Journal shall not be held liable for any errors in content, advertising, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.