Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor). It is acceptable if the submission has been deposited in a preprint server; however, this must be disclosed upon article submission, along with the preprint's DOI or link.
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines. Vancouver Style with brackets is used for references.
  • All listed authors meet the ICMJE criteria for authorship (substantial contribution to the conception or design of the work or to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; drafting or critically revising the manuscript; final approval of the version to be published; and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work), and no one meeting these criteria has been omitted.
  • If the submission involves human subjects, human data, or animal research, it includes a statement confirming approval by the appropriate institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee (or documented exemption), that informed consent was obtained from participants, and that consent to publish was obtained for any identifiable individual data or images. If the study is a clinical trial, its registration number and registry name (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov) are provided. Where the work did not undergo ethics review, the manuscript states why.
  • All authors consent to the manuscript being processed by IMJ's AI review system for peer evaluation, on the understanding that the manuscript will be treated confidentially and not be used to train AI models.
  • The manuscript begins with the title page, followed by the completed Author Declaration, both as set out in Templates and Forms.

Author Guidelines

IMJ Author Guidelines

Publication Charges

The Internet Medical Journal charges no article processing charges, submission fees, or page charges. Publishing with IMJ is free to authors.

Editorial Timeline

The journal targets an initial editorial decision within three weeks of submission. Accepted articles are published on a rolling basis, typically within two weeks of acceptance, and receive a DOI with permanent archiving in the journal's Zenodo community.

Manuscript Preparation

Prepare submissions in Microsoft Word, OpenOffice, or RTF format, double-spaced, using a 12-point font, with italics (not underlining) for emphasis. All submissions must adhere to the ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work.

AI Consultation Reports should be prepared using the journal's Word template, available at https://www.medjournal.com/index.php/pub/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/1 .

Preprints

IMJ permits deposit of submissions on a preprint server. If the submission has been posted as a preprint, this must be disclosed at the time of submission, along with the preprint's DOI or link. This is not considered prior publication.

Authorship

All listed authors must meet the ICMJE criteria for authorship: substantial contribution to the work; drafting or critically revising the manuscript; final approval of the version to be published; and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. No individual meeting these criteria may be omitted, and no individual who does not meet them should be listed as an author.

Ethics and Trial Registration

Submissions involving human subjects, human data, or animal research must include a statement of approval by the appropriate institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee, or documentation of exemption. Single-patient narrative accounts, including AI Consultation Reports, are not considered human subjects research and require no IRB statement; they must instead meet the anonymization requirements stated in the journal's template. Clinical trials must report their registration number and registry name (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov).

Competing Interests

All submitting authors must file a Competing Interest (CI) statement disclosing any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence the work.

Funding and Supporting Agencies

Authors must disclose all sources of research funding and institutional support. If the study was supported in whole or in part by NIH funding, authors are responsible for depositing the Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) in PubMed Central (PMC) via the NIH Manuscript Submission System (NIHMS), in accordance with the NIH Public Access Policy; IMJ does not perform this deposit on the author's behalf.

References

References should follow Vancouver Style using brackets: references should be cited in the text using sequential numbers in square brackets, in the order they first appear (e.g., [1], [1,2] for multiple references, [1-4] for a range). The reference list should appear at the end of the manuscript in the same numerical sequence as cited in-text, not alphabetically.

Figures, Tables, and Supporting Information

Figures and tables should be placed within the text at the appropriate point, or submitted as separate files per journal preference. Supporting information (datasets, appendices, checklists, extended figures/tables) should be named using an "S" plus a number (e.g., "S1 Table," "S2 Fig.") and captions listed at the end of the manuscript.

Original Research

Original Research reports new empirical findings, including clinical studies, methodological analyses, and secondary analyses of previously published data. Submissions include a structured abstract, methods described in sufficient detail to permit replication, and a data and code availability statement. All submissions undergo peer review.

Perspectives

Perspectives are short, argument-driven articles that advance a defined position on a current question in clinical medicine, research methodology, or health policy. Each Perspective grounds its argument in published evidence and cites primary sources. Typical length is 800 to 1,500 words with an unstructured abstract. All submissions undergo peer review.

Methods Notes

Methods Notes provide a concise, citable definitional source for a statistical metric, algorithm, or analytic procedure. Each note states the formula and its assumptions, presents a worked computation, and gives guidance on interpretation and reporting. Typical length is 1,000 to 2,000 words. A data and code availability statement is required. All submissions undergo peer review.

Medical Humanities

The Medical Humanities section publishes work that draws lessons from clinical practice, medical education, or the experience of illness. Each piece includes an abstract and a reference list. Musical scores, images, and audio are published as supplementary files. Typical length is 500 to 2,500 words. Peer review is done on all content.

AI Consultation Reports

Understood — that's a different article type, and CARE doesn't fit it. The subject is the clinician's reasoning and the AI consultation; the patient is context. First person is the point, not a lapse.

I'd give it its own name rather than filing it under Case Reports. "AI Consultation Reports" says what it is and is searchable.

Title: AI Consultation Reports
Abbreviation: AICR
Word count limit: 2000

Section Policy:


This section publishes first-person accounts by clinicians of consulting a generative artificial intelligence tool during real patient care. The subject is the clinical encounter with the tool: what you were stuck on, what you asked, what it returned, what you did with it, and how it turned out.

Reports are written in the first person and follow this sequence: the clinical situation and the point at which you reached the limit of your own reasoning; the tool used, including version and date, and how you posed the question; what the tool returned, quoted or closely paraphrased; what you did with that output and why; the clinical outcome; and what you would do differently.

Accounts in which the tool was unhelpful, misleading, or confidently wrong are as welcome as accounts in which it helped, and the section will not be useful if only successes are submitted.

Patient details are limited to what the clinical question requires and must be de-identified. Where the patient remains identifiable from the account, written consent to publish is required. Authors must state whether identifiable patient information was entered into the tool and confirm the use complied with institutional and national data protection requirements.

Reports describe encounters that actually occurred. Constructed or illustrative examples are not accepted here.

Typical length is 800 to 1,500 words with an unstructured abstract. All submissions undergo peer review.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.